Ending the Israel-Hamas War and Path to Peace (2025)
Donald Trump's 20-point plan for Gaza, unveiled on September 29, 2025, aims to end the Israel-Hamas war and includes key elements such as an immediate ceasefire, hostage and prisoner exchanges, demilitarization, and reconstruction under international oversight. The plan has received mixed reactions, with Hamas accepting parts but refusing to disarm, and Israel opposing Palestinian statehood. This webpage provides an overview of the plan, its transformations, and why China and Russia abstained from supporting the UN Security Council resolution endorsing it.[1][2][3]
The 20-point plan focuses on immediate relief, security, and long-term stability:
The plan has garnered support from Israel, the PA, Egypt, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and European leaders, but Hamas views it as a "surrender" due to disarmament demands.[1][3]
The plan aims to transform Gaza from a conflict zone to a stable, demilitarized area under international oversight. Key transformations include:
However, critics argue it prioritizes Israeli security without addressing root issues like settlements or statehood, risking prolonged occupation.[4]
China and Russia abstained from voting on the UN Security Council resolution endorsing Trump's plan. Russia circulated a rival resolution emphasizing Palestinian statehood and opposing foreign intervention but abstained, allowing the U.S.-backed resolution to pass with 13 votes in favor. Hamas rejected it, claiming it imposes an international trusteeship on Gaza. The Palestinian Authority welcomed it, expressing readiness to participate. China and Russia view the plan as biased toward Israel and U.S. interests, lacking enforcement for Palestinian rights, and potentially undermining UN authority.[5][6]
Trump's 20-point plan offers a pragmatic path to ceasefire and reconstruction but faces skepticism due to its imbalances and lack of Palestinian input. Transformations in governance and security could stabilize Gaza, but without addressing statehood and settlements, it risks failure. China and Russia's abstention underscores global divisions. Progress depends on inclusive negotiations and enforcement. Monitor UN Security Council (https://www.un.org/securitycouncil) for updates.[1][2]